Many of you surely have played four-player games in the past.and it's pretty damn fun. the other morning when four of us sat down and played BAM 99 for hours on multiplayer. I was actually a pretty stoic supporter of this line of thought until about 2 a.m. There's a fairly justifiable argument that there wasn't actually anything wrong with Bust-A-Move 2, and that messing with any of it is just a waste of time. Two Bust-A-Moves turned up for review this month, and although at first look they're pretty similar, it's ironic that number three (99) seems to offer a bit more than number four. At least the N64 BAM '99 offers a four-player mode. I can't come up with a single reason to recommend this title (although it is "value priced" at under $30). BUST A MOVE 4 OST SERIESNone of those features are mind-blowing, mind you, but why settle for an inferior chapter of a series that is already very similar from installment to installment? Basically. BAM '99 is missing the pulley action, the vibration and the better graphics. Anyway, this is not a good deal at all - Bust-A-Move 4 (the one I think you should be getting instead, in case you couldn't tell by my inferences) has everything BAM '99 has and more. I know Acclaim isn't the type to milk older titles or licenses, but Money talks, I suppose. That is, if you fall into each and every one of these categories: You don't own Bust-A-Move 3 AND you don't own Bust-A-Move 4 AND you are a die-hard crazy psychopath Bust-A-Move fool AND you can't find a copy of Bust-A-Move 4 anywhere (and you've looked everywhere) AND you feel you'll never, ever EVER find a copy of Bust-A-Move 4- Get the point yet? You see, BAM '99 is a repackaged BAM 3 with a couple of very trivial additions, like extra puzzle stages. Should you buy Bust-A-Move '99 for the PlayStation? Yes, Definitely, Without a doubt.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |